New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
New Step by Step Map For speaker production order jurisdiction case law in india
Blog Article
5. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel for that complainant further argued that during the investigation of the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led for the recovery of sleeping supplements on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore continues to be produced before the Court wherein the sleeping drugs were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected while in the liver although not while in the belly. For this reason, the recovery of explained sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General as well as counsel for the complainant have also argued that during the investigation of the case the petitioner Bhoora led on the recovery of the motorcycle.
The focus is over the intention to cause injury. This is often a major dilemma: an incredibly minimal threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable to the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed during the bank and because only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
“Making certain the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple trustworthy sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a perfectly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation incorporates the names with the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it absolutely was decided, and also the book in which it's recorded. Different citation requirements may well contain italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
Electronic and paper court records retained at the court site is often viewed in the courthouse for free, however there can be a charge of ten cents per page to print from a public access terminal.
department concerned shall supply the complete set of ACRs with the concerned officer to DPC effectively in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears along with a new system is put in its place.
Executing a case law search might be as easy as coming into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, which include:
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by undertaking an act which in the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently hazardous that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death on the these person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay back fixation are not entertainable for the reasons that such matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, along with the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate as a result this petition is dismissed, which includes disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court is not inside of a position to dilate upon these types of disputes in constitutional more info jurisdiction. Read more
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary for the determination of the current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]